A New Theory on Providence’s Ending

by Alexx KayProvidence10-reg

The recent cover releases of Providence issue 10, suggesting that it is going to deal with “The Haunter of the Dark” (as opposed to the more general expectation that that would be in issue 12), combined with the events of issue 8, and a recent reread of Promethea, have sparked a new idea in my head about where this is all going.

Potential spoilers follow.

Moore has stated on multiple occasions that he wrote Neonomicon while in a “bad mood”.

“It is one of the blackest, most misanthropic pieces that I’ve ever done. I was in a very, very bad mood.”

“That was something I did when I was in a very bad mood”

One implication is that his bad mood was in the past, and he feels better now. If he does feel better, then why would he spend a year of his creative life merely laying back story that leads up to Neonomicon’s incredibly bleak ending? Well, maybe he isn’t. Maybe he’s going to end up telling us that Neonomicon’s ending didn’t mean what we thought it did.

Moore has of course built much of his career on recontextualizing the work of other artists. But he is also willing to recast works of his own. In multiple interviews about Show Pieces, his film collaboration with Mitch Jenkins, Moore has related variations of the following anecdote:

Metterton & Matchbright poster
Two very naughty boys.

Jimmy’s End, which was the first one that was written … [was] a short, self-contained 10 minute film. … If you just saw that on its own, then I’d think you’d be pretty clear that, oh yeah, this is God and the devil. … when the proposal was put to me to expand upon that idea, I initially said, “Well, no, I can’t, because we’ve given it all away at the end of the story; there’s nowhere you can go after that.” Then I started thinking, “Well, what if it wasn’t God and the devil? What if it was just two very naughty boys who were pretending to be God and the devil?””

I suspect Moore is building to a similar recontextualization in Providence.

Neonomicon ends with the imminent birth of Cthulhu, who, it is implied, will bring about the end of humanity, who are “pretty much vermin” (Neonomicon #4 P24,p2). But this is largely implication, not outright statement. How might it be recast to a less nihilistic interpretation?

Promethea: A cozy Apocalypse

Well, if we’re talking about Alan Moore recontextualizing the end of the world, we clearly should take another look at Promethea. For those who haven’t read it, here is an incredibly reductive summary: Sophie Bangs is the latest incarnation of Promethea, an avatar of the human imagination. Sophie learns a lot about the magical structure of the universe, including the news that her incarnation of Promethea is prophesied to oversee the Apocalypse. This Apocalypse would involve humanity moving from the physical plane (Malkuth, sephiroth 10 in Kabbalah), upwards into the plane of imagination (Yesod, sephiroth 9). When this Apocalypse transpires, it turns out to be more of a momentary enlightenment, with humanity maintaining their physical existence afterwards. The world is NOT ended, and is indeed significantly improved from what it had been.

So much for the pre-Providence background. On to theory!

Robert Black lives in a world where Lovecraftian monsters are demonstrably physically real, and have been for at least many centuries. While these monsters are in many ways more powerful than human beings, in a social sense they are weaker, and are often victims of oppression. Those monsters have been working for a very long time to manipulate the border between dreams and reality to bring about some sort of Apocalypse. Robert Black is obviously central to their plans in some fashion.

Many readers, certainly including myself, have been assuming that this desired Apocalypse is one that will overwrite ordinary reality with one controlled by the monsters. I think Moore has deliberately encouraged this assumption, and it is one that is consistent with a great deal of post-Lovecraft Lovecraftian fiction. I now strongly suspect that this is a red herring.

The monsters do not need to be made real. The monsters of Providence ARE real already. What they actually want is nearly the opposite. The Apocalypse sought by the monsters is similar to the one Moore initially seemed to be setting up in Promethea. The monsters are preparing to REMOVE themselves from reality, where they are (despite their best efforts) mortal and vulnerable, instead ascending to the immortal state of dreams and fictions.

Robert Black is their Herald precisely because of what we readers have been mocking as obliviousness. He has a firm worldview in which monsters cannot exist except as metaphors. Lovecraft, “the Redeemer”, has if anything an even harsher, more materialistic worldview. This is the world the monsters wish to bring about. A world in which the fictional monsters written of by H.P. Lovecraft can never die, and grow only stronger as time goes by. The monsters win, by creating OUR world.

Advertisements

7 thoughts on “A New Theory on Providence’s Ending

  1. Hmmm…rereading “Innsmouth” right now…with the oncoming horror of WWII that Robert dreams of there…nope, I’m stuck all day and in every way.

    Like

  2. That’s a very good idea! Didn’t see it coming! Well thought up, might actually be correct. Perhaps Robert is the Herald of doom for supernatural creatures, who previously were generally believed to be real by most people. The 20th Century is going to be more rational, folk beliefs disappear as cities grow and cultures mix together, losing their connection to their history.

    Robert’s left his family and his culture, and is incapable of believing in monsters. He can only see them in terms of the new science of psychology, and whatever else.

    So maybe our friends want the true immortality that Lovecraft can give them. And only Lovecraft can do it, because he’s a good enough writer, and has an imagination that’s suitable for the sort of creepy things that they are.

    By Lovecraft immortalising them, they maintain their place in the imagination of people of the future. Perhaps that’s why Lovecraft, who therefore knew about the reality of it, decided to make his characters and settings available to other writers. So they could live and adapt through the years. Even going as far as appearing in comics for early-21st Century nerds.

    It’s a brilliant plan, and it fits in with Promethea pretty well, while being different enough from it not just to be a copy. That would mean Neonomicon, relative to Providence, would continue being a work of fiction, nothing else. It doesn’t have to be the future of Providence.

    Like

    • I think that, even if this theory is true, Neonomicon IS the future of Providence — it’s just that at some point after Cthulhu emerges, he triggers the apocalypse which ends the world — by retroactively changing history so that the monsters were ALWAYS fictions.

      Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s